If the IC exhaust is saturated at 100C, the best the wood can do is reach an
equilibrium moisture content with respect to this environment. Best check a
psychrometric chart to convince yourself. It's the partial pressure of water
in the exhaust that will, ultimately, inhibit drying, even though if the
feedstock is cooler that the I.C. exhaust, some heat may be transferred to
it via condensation on its surface. One simply need to know the dewpoint of
the exhaust gas to determine whether or not this is a fool's errand. Flush a
Pyrex Erlenmeyer flask with exhaust and fit a stopper with a penetration for
an RTD and observe the temperature of condensation, as a first
approximation, and observe the water-carrying capacity along the line of
constant water. This is not 100% accurate, of course, because the specific
volume of the gas will change as it cools. Plus, if the dryer is "direct"
the gas will quickly mix with surrounding air.

What about home-made heat pipes? I use the commercial versions for sensible
heat extraction on industrial heat pump systems.

Best, Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of doug.williams
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:29 AM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Gasifiers and greenhouses and CO2 augmentation.

Hi Toby and Colleagues,

You ask a couple of curly questions:

>We seem to have moved on from the direct heating (drying) of fuel without
really answering the original question of water content in IC exhaust. I
understand the indirect heating, like Doug's >nearly horizontal heat
exchanger, but what about the direct introduction of engine exhaust gas for
drying incoming fuel? Of course not all H2 is converted into H2O in an IC
engine, but one >would hope a significant portion is. Same with CO and CO2.
If 15% is H2, is 15% of the exhaust water vapor? 

I am sure there are equations that will confirm a "perfect" answer, other
than mine, which is more H2, more water vapour. So long as the gas is hotter
than 100C, wood can be dried down without any problems by direct contact.

>Has anyone tried putting a producer gas fired engine exhaust directly into
a stock of wood fuel?

You have possibly missed the exchanges of discussing direct exhaust heat
into a fuel pile to make torrified wood.  Ken Calvert specifically used this
to overcome the problems of gasification in the tropics, and I had to use it
in Papua New Guinea just to get enough dry fuel to start a gasification
project for the first time. We also used it on our first project back in
1978 in New Zealand, resulting in the wood blocks catching fire as we learnt
the hard way, gaining experience. It's as simple as a drum with a gas space
in the bottom, connected to the exhaust as close to the engine as possible
to reduce heat loss. It's best to try it and learn by experience if it is
for you, but, I would not want to promote this type of direct drying, for
anything commercial.

>One final thought on greenhouse. Engine exhaust would presumably make most
of the CO into CO2 (but not all) and H2 into H2O, benefiting the plants.

Without question, it has been already established, that using producer gas
through an engine without first scrubbing the gas, could place the crop at
risk. I do however see a lot of potential to used scrubbed and compressed
CO2, used in a system of micro-porous support tubing to control white fly
and aphids.

 >This would seem to be an argument for having not only a gasifier, but an
engine or combustor in greenhouse application.

That is how it might appear, but there is very little demonstrated and
tested using producer gas to support any argument.

>But is there any way to assure a safe level of CO for direct exhaust into a
greenhouse? Does it rise or fall in a collum or can one assure a complete
reaction in some way?

Issues of CO and human safety usually resort to badge monitoring for the
individual. Plants however only thrive, I have been advised, in a 10% CO2
atmosphere.  I cannot imagine it piling up as layered slug of inert gas, as
the greenhouse should have a circulation capability if heated. Not sure what
you mean by a complete reaction.

Does this help or hinder?

Doug Williams,
Fluidyne.

_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to
reflect the change.
Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator



_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to reflect 
the change.
Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator

Reply via email to