For those who like gaudy numbers, it's going to be hard for Harrell to
lose as long as Tech keeps winning... Right or wrong...   I would put
Tebow at 2nd or 3rd... I don't think Bradford should be in the
discussion... Tebow, McCoy and Harrell are the leaders, IMHO...

Crabtree... Well, receivers shouldn't get it since they don't touch
the ball enough to be a consistent force, positive or negative...
Plus, when they DO touch it, it tends to be good... You don't see
stats for receivers fumbling (like you do QBs and RBs) and you
definitely don't see INTs attributed to WRs, even though they are
often the cause, not the QB...

- PiggieBert

On Nov 12, 9:15 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looking at the list of voters, it is not too surprising that the Big 12 holds 
> 4 of the top 5 spots.  Out of ten voters, 4 are from Big 12 states (2 from 
> TX, 1 OK, 1 MO), only 1 voter is from an SEC state (TN).  There are no voters 
> from a Big 11 state.  You have 2 ostensibly neutral voters in Dennis Dodd of 
> CBS and John Lindsay of Scripps, the other voters are from Colorado, Utah and 
> New Jersey.
> Not quite an unbiased sampling... This week's poll, with statistics from last 
> week:
>
> Player, Position, School, Last Week, Points
>
> 1. Graham Harrell, QB, Texas Tech, 40-for-50, 456 yards passing, 6 TDs, 44 (7)
> 2. Colt McCoy, QB, Texas, 26-for-37, 300 yards passing, 5 TDs, 34 (2)
> 3. Sam Bradford, QB, Okla., 22-for-33, 320 yards passing, 4 TDs, TD run, 31
> 4. Tim Tebow, QB, Florida, 12-for-17, 171 yards passing, 3 TDs; 88 yards 
> rushing, 2 TD runs, 23 (1)
> 5. Michael Crabtree, WR, Tex. Tech, 8 receptions, 89 yards, 3 TDs, 12

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to