Hey, how 'bout them Hogs, coming in at #15? We even got five players
from Florida, which was pretty cool... Give us a couple of years and
look out :)

Good job on the recruiting, Gators!

- PiggieManBert

On Feb 5, 10:28 am, "Shane Ford" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm....  Rivals has us ranked at #10, which is a little lower than ESPN 
> (#5).  
>
> PROSPECT COMMITMENTS
>
> SchoolTOTAL
> Commits
> Commits
> CommitsAvg Stars
> Points
> 1Alabama2741493.812,786
> 2LSU2551193.842,762
> 3Ohio State2521583.762,478
> 4USC1941123.892,410
> 5Texas2031163.852,375
> 6Florida State2121083.622,154
> 7Michigan2211363.592,124
> 8North Carolina29113103.342,084
> 9Georgia1811343.832,053
> 10Florida163943.942,017
> 11Miami202983.601,968
> 12South Carolina29014113.341,952
> 13Oklahoma23011113.431,830
> 14UCLA27011143.331,752
> 15Arkansas3018203.301,689
> 16Michigan State23010103.301,675
> 17Ole Miss3718223.111,628
> 18Auburn2809163.211,599
> 19Stanford2208123.271,583
> 20Notre Dame171943.471,508
> 21Texas A&M2814213.141,403
> 22Mississippi State2707173.151,395
> 23Tennessee1808103.441,387
> 24Virginia Tech2205143.091,357
> 25Penn State2707122.961,335
>
> -------------- Original message from "Buck Shot" <[email protected]>: 
> --------------
>
> Actually it is Rivals that has some 'nolie ownership.  Gene Williams, aka 
> Dot.com, has some type of ownership there.  As as a result, many times FSU's 
> recruits are "enhanced" and UF's are "devalued.  The crazy thing about this 
> is other than the FSU - UF thing, Rivals is perhap the best of the services 
> for ranking recruits and classes.  Scout, IMNO, is the poorest, due to their 
> rating system which is based on the total number of recruits you sign.  So 
> when we signed a relatively small class, no matter if all 16 had been 5 star 
> recruits, we had no chance to be ranked in the top 10.  ESPN, which in the 
> past has been a joke, for the last two or three years has made a serious 
> committment to HS recruiting and now their credibility is among the best.  Go 
> Figure.............
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Shane Ford
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:04 AM
> Subject: Re: FW: [gatortalk] Re: Rank
>
> I look at it this way...  Scout.com's rankings of our recruiting classes 
> versus F$U's has explained the scoring differential in the past 4 years games 
> (UF has outscored F$U 145 to 48) since 2005.  Hmmmmm....  You think they may 
> be inflating F$U's class rankings and deflating ours????  :-)
>
> GO GATORS!!!
>
> Shane Ford
> Nashville Gator
>
> -------------- Original message from "Oliver Barry" <[email protected]>: 
> --------------
>
> They never like us.  I noticed Nick Alajajian was a 5 star player by them 
> until he committed to the Gators, then he suddenly became a 4 star.
> Sump'n fishy there!
> Oliver
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gatornet Admin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 5:41 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Rank
>
> Didn't we learn several years ago that Scout was owned and operated by nolies?
>
> Randy Lyons
> Sent wirelessly
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Rank
>
> According to the G'ville Sun:
> ESPN     5
> Rivels   7
>
> According to their NSD site:
> Scout    21
>
> GoGators!!!
> Mark
>
> Quoting Oliver Barry <[email protected]>:
>
> > I know it doesn't matter what they all think, but has anyone seen where our
> > class is ranked by all the different services?
> > Oliver
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to