hmmm  24 pts?

i dont think we cover unless our offense looks totally differnet this week.
If we win.. itll be by 2 TDs maybe...




On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Cathryn Lasky <[email protected]>wrote:

> Looks like we're favored by 24 according to USA Today odds page.  Pickem is
> also up and the line there is 23.5.
>
>  On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Woody wrote:
>
>  Do we have a line on this game yet?
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steve McKibben <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>   Thanks for providing your insights Bert - I always enjoy them.
>>
>> If I can play devil's advocate I'd like to address some of your points
>> (see - it's not just you Keith!)
>>
>> 1) Florida's defense is on par with 'Bama's, so I suspect we will
>> struggle. HOWEVER, we have significantly improved since the 'Bama game, so
>> I don't think we'll be shutdown.
>>
>> Do you think your improvement may have to do with the fact that you've
>> played defenses that aren't as good since the 'Bama game?
>>
>> Mallett is getting a lot better at finding his 3rd or 4th option quickly.
>> But y'all are right that he's a pocket passer, and not a scrambler. If he
>> scrambles, he'll look to run some, but mostly will try to set up outside the
>> pocket and throw. He usually makes good decisions regarding throwing it away
>> though.
>>
>> If he doesn't thow quickly he'll be meat. He's a stout kid, but QBs that
>> aren't very mobile are usually in for long days against us, especially if
>> they have a lot of long developing patterns. I expect we'll see a lot of
>> slants, quick outs, and bubble screens to try and keep our offense off of
>> the field and our linemen and linebackers off of Mallett. I hope we don't
>> get any stupid personal fouls, but I know some of our players were pissed
>> off at Mallett last year when he shoved some of our players on your sideline
>> after they had made tackles.
>>
>> 2) Our top receiver, Joe Adams, had a minor stroke (yes, you read that
>> right) last Monday and didn't play over the weekend.
>>
>> I read that - I hope the young man has a complete and quick recovery -
>> that is just so scary for a kid that age.
>>
>> 3) Our second leading receiver, Jarius Wright, had a concussion on
>> Saturday, so his status is unknown for Saturday. The hit he took
>> wasn't as nasty as Tebow's, but as always, you don't want to rush back to
>> the field.
>>
>> I think he should take the advice of Zeb's neurologist buddies and wait
>> awhile to play - at the very least one more game.  ;)
>>
>> 4) Our running game is finally starting to come into its own. It took
>> a bit for our O-line, which was primarily recruited for run blocking,
>> to get the balance worked out after working so hard on adjusting to
>> pass block.
>>
>> Smith is a weapon - do you know how his hamstring is coming along? The USC
>> transfer is a big back, but I don't think he's nearly as scary as Scott from
>> LSU and we held him pretty much in check.
>>
>> 5) One of our top weapons right now is Dennis Johnson, our kick
>> returner. He leads the SEC in average and is sixth in the nation. He's
>> something else when he gets a lane.
>>
>> Should be a good matchup - our coverage teams have been very good this
>> year - the kid from Kentucky (Locke I think) was not allowed to hurt us -
>> and we kicked off a lot that game!
>>
>> 6) I don't think y'all will run wild on our defense, as they are much
>> improved, but I know we'll struggle against y'all.
>>
>> My pick: Florida 27, Arkansas 17.
>>
>> I'd take that in a heartbeat - My score prediction is Gators 34, Hogs 7.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Steve McKibben
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to