I know Oliver will ride a 100 miles on his bicycle and his only motivation is a 
good rack of ribs, hot chicken wings and a cold one when he's finished. 
Personal satisfaction?  Maybe afterwards when he's hugging the toilet?  ;-)

GO GATORS!!!!!


Shane Ford
Sent From My iPhone
Go Gators!  &  Skol Vikes!

On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Rob Alexander <[email protected]> wrote:

> All good thoughts, Randy, and I agree with most of what you say. The down 
> side of playing a major out of conference opponent are just as you said, and 
> I totally understand about your wanting as many visits for your season ticket 
> as you can get. 
> 
> What I would disagree with is that the only reason you'd play such a game is 
> to build a reputation. One might play such a game because it would be an 
> exciting challenge. One might play such a game for pride. One might play such 
> a game for fun. Being top-level competitors, our players might enjoy the 
> chance to face a team like Boise State who carry on publicly about how 
> they're as good as an SEC team. (Just one example.)
> 
> By your argument, no one would ever climb Everest, walk the Appalachian 
> trail, compete in an amateur triathlon, or do any other dangerous or rigorous 
> thing that brings no public recognition or financial reward. After all, 
> there's no up side to climbing Everest except the personal satisfaction of 
> having challenged yourself and succeeded, while the down side may be fatal. 
> Sometimes you do these things anyway because you're a competitor and you want 
> to compete against the best. 
> 
> Personally, I wouldn't ask us to give up all the patsy games. I, too, think 
> that small teams deserve the right to their challenges. I'd just ask that the 
> twelfth game that the NCAA added be against a respectable out of conference 
> opponent whom we would otherwise be unlikely to play (changing the opponent 
> every two years). Even though I know that all of the bad things you said are 
> true, I'd still do it. The fans would love it and the players would love it. 
> It would keep the program invigorated and exciting. Anyway, that's where I'm 
> coming from when I say these things.
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:51 PM, "Randy Platt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> I really questioned if I wanted to chime in on this discussion.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Personally, I am fine with the way our schedule is set up.  I would rather
>> have two games at home against patsies as opposed to a home and home with a
>> head knocker.  And really that is what everybody wants, a game against a top
>> 25 team  from another conference.   I mean whenever this discussion comes up
>> the teams mentioned are the Texas, Oklahoma, Michigan, Ohio State, USC
>> (west), Stanford, nobody ever says why don't we do home and home with
>> Baylor, Northwestern, Iowa State, Kansas or  anybody from the big east.  And
>> just for the record, it takes two to tango, I feel pretty confident that
>> other schools would want a home and home anymore than we want one with them.
>> The only reason you play those games is to enhance your reputation.  I
>> believe major college athletics in general and football specifically are a
>> business and about making money, but not just television and gate revenues,
>> but licensing revenues and booster/donor contributions as well.  There is no
>> doubt in my mind that Jeremy Foley is equivalent to a CEO of a major
>> corporation. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Another reason I like the schedule format as is, it ensures I get an extra
>> visit to Gainesville.  Being a season ticket, I attend all the home games,
>> hot, cold, rain or shine. So if you go to a home and home it would eliminate
>> a visit.  Since I have already stated that money is the driving factor, I
>> believe I would still be paying about $1,000.00 (including booster
>> contribution) for six games instead of seven.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I also see nothing to be gained by playing a tougher out of conference
>> opponent.  I only see a downside.  Regardless of winning or losing,  a
>> tougher opponent will not get us any closer to the SECCG or the MNCG, we
>> still need to win our division and the SECCG to get to the MNCG.  However, I
>> believe such a game may cause us to lose an SEC game due to injuries or
>> fatigue.  Therefore, I see no upside potential in such a game.  Granted the
>> game would be exciting and fun to watch, but I can wait to catch them in a
>> bowl game.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I really have not thought about the impact such a series of scheduling would
>> have on other teams.  My point being how do the UAB's, UCF's, FAU's of this
>> world improve their lot, since no one wants to play them because they are
>> deemed a patsy.  Now, Div I-AA (Furman for us this year) or whatever it is
>> called now, I can see eliminating those games in favor of Div I teams, but I
>> am not sure everybody could get a 12 game schedule without them.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Anyway, I like the schedule because it give me more chances to get to
>> Gainesville.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> JAFO
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Randy Platt
>> 
>> aka "PCGator"
>> 
>> aka "The Armchair Quarterback"
>> 
>> aka "The Other Randy"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Later Gators! Afterwhile the Rest!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PS  which of the three games this year FAU, UAB or Furman would you replace
>> and with whom?  Remember, UAB is the week before we go to UT and Furman is
>> the week before FSU.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
>> 1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
>> 2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
>> 2008 National Football Champions   |   
>> Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
>> Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
>> <winmail.dat>
> 
> -- 
> GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
> 1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
> 2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
> 2008 National Football Champions   |   
> Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
> Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

Reply via email to