It all depends on what other people are hanging around the lobby or
surrounding areas. It's not uncommon to see "ladies of the evening" using
such areas as their office. Just sayin..

 

Stephen Manuel

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of John Vega
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [gatortalk] Re: [gatornews] GatorNews From The Gainesville SUN
For 2/17, AM Edition

 

I also question whether it is even a benefit.

 

I would much rather live on campus in a dorm where my friends, members of
the opposite sex, and parties are located. Most have common rooms with
kitchens where one can cook, and relax with friends.

 

Being stuck in a hotel room for a year of college seems like a punishment to
me.

 

-Zeb

 

On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Jerry D. Belloit wrote:





I find the NCAA's position here a little strange.  I stayed for two months
at a local Holiday Inn for $500 per month per room.  (Daily rate not much
higher than what was charged to the students.)  The rate was a special rate
given to  University employees.  It is not uncommon for hotels to negotiate
lower rates for extended stays, especially when the hotel expects to get
future business from the transaction.  Apparently this hotel was charging
$450 per month.  That does not seem unreasonably low.  I am surprised that
this particular count was not challenged.  In addition, I suspect that the
hotel got some additional business by having some popular athletes living
there.

 

Jerry  

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Rob Alexander
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 6:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [gatortalk] Re: [gatornews] GatorNews From The Gainesville SUN
For 2/17, AM Edition

 

I think there are several specific cases and that the journalist who wrote
the story has mixed the numbers from different cases together, so they don't
make sense. That said, I think it's the $14.95 and the $57 numbers that
matter. As far as I can tell, it seems the article is saying the student
athletes actually did pay $14.95 per night and the NCAA is saying that no
regular person could possibly have stayed there at that rate. The NCAA is
saying that $57 per night is the cheapest rate that they would believe was
not a special deal for the student athletes. 

 

While I have no idea what hotel we're talking about or what they charge, or
how true any of this is, the basic concept of the allegation seems
reasonable to me. If you had never, ever charged any other non-athlete
customer less than $57 per night, but you regularly let athletes stay for
$14.95 per night, that would sure look like you were giving an improper
benefit. 

 

Rob

 

 

Sent from my iPad


On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:29 PM, John Vega <[email protected]> wrote:

 

On Feb 17, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Shane Ford wrote:






The bulk of improper benefits come from 12 athletes staying at the Whitney
Hotel at $450 each for a two-bedroom suite.

The NCAA found the hotel a few miles off campus charged a rate of $14.95 per
athlete for two-bedroom suites. The NCAA said the rate should've been more
than $57 per night for each athlete. One football player who spent more than
year at the hotel, the NCAA said, received an extra benefit worth $19,280.

The NCAA said the school received $47,000 worth of improper benefits from
the rate reduction.

 

Color me confused.

 

Is the NCAA saying that the Whitney rate was too low; too high, or that
student-athletes shouldn't be allowed to stay in hotels?

 

I'd be stunned to find a hotel that offered a rate of $14.95 per person for
a two-bedroom suite. Not even on Priceline.

 

If the rate should have been $57, the University got overcharged. How is
that a benefit to the players (unless the football players happen to own the
hotel)?

 

-Zeb

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

 

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

 

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

Reply via email to