I don't know, putting in WKRP might cut down on the Real Audio Traffic

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: GNAT Box Future Direction


Send postings to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access the list archives at:
http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
----------------------------------
I haven't purchased GB yet, but I do plan to in the near future.  I second
the motion: concentrate on the firewall, leave DNS, DHCP, syslog, NTP, WKRP,
off.  If I need one of these services, I'll configure a Linux or BSD box to
run them.  If it becomes too modular, I'm sure it'd soon develop as many
holes as a Microsoft product.

Dirk


-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Mike Benedict
Sent:   Thursday, February 17, 2000 3:37 PM
To:     '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:        RE: GNAT Box Future Direction

Send postings to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access the list archives at:
http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
----------------------------------
> I even question some of the added features such as
> a DNS server unless it is a straight BIND port that
> can be patched easily.

I too question the need.  I didn't buy Gnat Box so I could have a DNS
server, a DHCP server, a whatever server.  There are plenty of products out
there to fill these needs.  I'd prefer GTA spend it's energies on building a
damn good firewall and leave it at that.  That's what I need, that's what I
want, everything else is baggage.

Mike Benedict
----------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
in the body of the message

----------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
in the body of the message

Reply via email to