------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 19:03 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Andrew, please do not close bugs if you do not understand the problem. You > obviously have not even tried to understand the problem. This PR is related > to > 26076 but it is *not* a duplicate.
Then there are two issues, one for the reduced testcase which is PR 26076 and another issue. But please don't say I don't understand the issue when the fact is this testcase here actually reduces to the testcase in PR 26076. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26084
