------- Comment #10 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 19:10 ------- Subject: Re: ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code
On 03/09/06 14:03, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Then there are two issues, one for the reduced testcase which is PR 26076 and > another issue. But please don't say I don't understand the issue when the > fact > is this testcase here actually reduces to the testcase in PR 26076. > The fact that you closed one as a duplicate of the other is a clear indication that you have no idea what the issue is about. Reducing one test case to another one means nothing. The very reduction removes information that hides other bugs, or other aspects of the same bug. If you are so keen on closing PRs, close 26076 as a duplicate of this one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26084
