------- Comment #32 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 22:44 ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > So, I don't think a mpfr_signgam alone would really be useful. So, I think > that > choice 2 would be better.
Okay, sounds fine. Would this make it into 2.2.1 or 2.3? And do you have any very rough timeframe for each release so I can plan accordingly for gcc? Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335
