------- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 15:36 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Regarding the additional test cases given here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-03/msg00037.html > > I do believe that gfortran has this correct. [...]
I believe otherwise and thus think a follow up patch is needed, which covers the related but different issues, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-03/msg00046.html (I think the patch in for this PR (comment 10) is fine and thus I approved it.) Do you plan to backport the patch to 4.4? (Probably not to 4.3, I'd guess.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43265
