------- Comment #9 from runipg at broadcom dot com 2010-09-03 14:45 ------- Subject: Re: Bug with anonymous unions and bit-fields
Thank you so much. You can close this bug if you wish. -Runip On 03-Sep-2010, at 3:47 AM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-03 10:46 > ------- > If you look at the actual Standard, both alignment and allocation of > bit-fields > are implementation defined. Thus, as far as I can see, at best we are talking > about non-portable implementation defined behavior. If you want my advice, try > to stay away from those tricks, with and without anonymous struct. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45510 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45510
