------- Comment #12 from runipg at broadcom dot com  2010-09-03 21:12 -------
Subject: Re:  Bug with anonymous unions and bit-fields

Okay, I guess I was confused by "struct or union" semantics. Thanks!

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-03 20:53 
> -------
> I don't see anything confusing about it.  If you have:
> union { int a, b, c; } u;
> u.a overlaps u.b and u.c as well, and the same applies to bitfields.  union
> isn't struct, see ISO C99  The standard is clear on this.



Reply via email to