------- Comment #12 from don dot wakefield at gmail dot com  2010-09-10 15:24 
(In reply to comment #11)
> Sure. What I meant - contrary to wait you said, I think - is that an elegant
> and complete solution to this issue involves changing much more generally our
> code to *always* behave as if fseek(off * width) were called, not just 
> fseek(0)
> in the special case you care about.

Okay, I understand better now. My apologies, and thanks for your comments on
this issue.



Reply via email to