http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975



--- Comment #29 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-23 
13:19:30 UTC ---

>> Why doesn't it error for unlimited stack say on x86_64? 

Because on x86_64 the stack is still high enough (we are lucky). 



Note: I would not generally care about unlimited stack, 

but for some obscure reason GNU make spawns its sub-processes with unlimited

stack.

Reply via email to