https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #21) > >g: > > .quad .L.g,.TOC.@tocbase > > .previous > > .type g, @function > >.L.g: > > addis 9,2,.LC1@toc@ha > > addis 10,2,.LC0@toc@ha > > addi 9,9,.LC1@toc@l > > lxvw4x 32,0,9 > > ld 9,.LC0@toc@l(10) > > li 10,4 > > stxvw4x 32,9,10 > > But isn't this simply wrong-code?! I don't see anything wrong with it. The load seems straightforward enough and, AFAICS, the store code matches the stxvw4x example in the PowerISA 2.07 reference (in Storing an Unaligned Quadword to Big-Endian Storage on page 360). r9 is the address of B and r10 is the byte offset of B[1] from B.
