https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #26) > > likewise with --with-checking=yes,rtl,tree. > > However make check-ada fails with "gnatlib missing, exiting" > > If I cd gcc ; make check-gnat then most of those tests fail too (claims > > missing adainclude/adalib) > > Yes, as Arno said, you need to manually build libada in this setup: > make -C gcc gnatlib-shared > make -C gcc gnattools OK, I see, that's not been a pattern we've needed to use in the past. Is there some specific reason that this is preferred over the integrated case? The "raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851" manifests when doing the " make -C gcc gnatlib-shared " (at least for the yes,rtl,tree checking case). For the sake of experiment, will repeat with checking=release.
