https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > OK, I see, that's not been a pattern we've needed to use in the past. > Is there some specific reason that this is preferred over the integrated > case? It's more versatile, i.e. you can build custom libada's with specific options. > The "raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851" manifests when doing > the " make -C gcc gnatlib-shared " (at least for the yes,rtl,tree checking > case). For the sake of experiment, will repeat with checking=release. OK, thanks for experimenting, I'll try to reproduce tomorrow.
