--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> > Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as
> > r230285; currently we offer hints for misspelled command-line options (PR
> > 67613), and in the C FE for misspelled fields.
> > 
> > There's plenty more that could be implemented; see:
> >
> > for some other implementation ideas.
> I'm thinking it'd make sense to close this bug, since the basic spell
> corrector is in, and open separate issues for the "plenty more that could be
> implemented" so they can be focused on individually

Or, if opening separate issues, maybe this one could actually stay open and
become a meta-bug for all the other spell checker issues

Reply via email to