David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot> ---
Heh, I'd forgotten that this one was still open.

(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as
> r230285; currently we offer hints for misspelled command-line options (PR
> 67613), and in the C FE for misspelled fields.
> There's plenty more that could be implemented; see:
> for some other implementation ideas.

I think all of those ideas are done now; there may be others, but we can open
separate RFEs for them.

Let's close this one out.

Reply via email to