https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Heh, I'd forgotten that this one was still open.
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as
> r230285; currently we offer hints for misspelled command-line options (PR
> 67613), and in the C FE for misspelled fields.
>
> There's plenty more that could be implemented; see:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01090.html
> for some other implementation ideas.
I think all of those ideas are done now; there may be others, but we can open
separate RFEs for them.
Let's close this one out.
