--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Is the requirement just for functions that contain setjmp?  If so, the
> backend could just force frame pointers in cfun->calls_setjmp functions.

I think we should flip back fno-omit-frame-pointer on for gcc-8 as that breaks
the guarantee that we've had in the port for quite a while. I'm testing a patch
currently that I will get out first thing tomorrow to turn this back on.

If we want to turn it off that should be a conscious decision.

> If not, even if the default is tweaked again to be -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> on aarch64, the code is still wrong with explicit -fno-omit-frame-pointer,
> even before that change.

I think we should treat that as a separate but related issue.


Reply via email to