https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88750
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #22) > > This is the output from the lldb command (but this was not a debug build of > > gcc yet): > > $ lldb ./static_1.exe > > (lldb) target create "./static_1.exe" > > Current executable set to './static_1.exe' (x86_64). > > (lldb) run > > <snip> > > > __sb=0x0000000105c60840) at basic_ios.tcc:129 > > frame #9: 0x0000000105afcdf9 > > libstdc++.6.dylib`std::ios_base::Init::Init() + 681 > > frame #10: 0x0000000105ad30a0 > > ^^^^ so, you have a combination of things linking libstdc++ statically and > dynamically .. that seems fragile at best. > > Having said that - the tricky thing now is to determine what has "broken" > (it's probably going to be hard without a "before" and "after" case). Indeed - somehow you didn't get a statically linked executable. Quoting the full final link command would be interesting.
