https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #38 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #37) > Yes, it is a balancing act. Which option works better? Well the question really is what is bad about movsi_compare0 that could be easily fixed? The move is for free so there is no need for the "r,0" variant in principle, so if that helps reducing constraints on register allocation then we could remove or reorder that alternative.
