https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs-bisection
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
vect_patt_84.19_168 = MIN_EXPR <vect_patt_82.18_166, { 15, ... }>;
this one is new, but I think there's an existing open bug for the "widening"
pattern recognition failing to make sure the shift argument is kept in range.
Or maybe that was the same that spurred the MIN above (but IIRC that was
some "undefined behavior" thing, not wrong-code).
