https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121185
--- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #18) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #16) > > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #15) > > > > Created attachment 61950 [details] > > > > Close-to-minimal reproducer, 186 lines > > > > > > > > The division of the array pmatrix%value by trace is not performed > > > > elemental > > > > but just on the first array element. > > > > > > Great reproducer! > > > > > > Changing the line > > > > > > pmatrix%value = pmatrix%value / trace * pmatrix%degree > > > > > > to > > > > > > pmatrix%value(:) = pmatrix%value / trace * pmatrix%degree > > > > > > to suppress the reallocation on assignment fixes the testcase for me. > > > > > > Can you try to revert Mikael's recent changes and see if it fixes the > > > regression? > > > > Which commit by Mikael is that? must have been after Monday 0:01 or so. > > I am still checking the second example with the VEGAS/VAMP integration > > whether this is a similar problem or something else. > > The following commits come to mind: > > r16-2247, r16-2248, r16-2249 Actually, sorry, I cloned on 14:30 on Monday, so my head is: $ git show HEAD commit 47a7dcd4c027bcc98760043c3416aa354f42b40e (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Mikael Morin <mik...@gcc.gnu.org> Date: Tue Jul 15 19:09:21 2025 +0200 which includes exactly the recent commit by Mikael Morin. Our CI result from midnight only shows one failing unit test (the VAMP/VEGAS) one, so from this I conclude: Mikael's commit broke the code of the "pol" example here and there is another problem. Is there any commit in the last week that would actually change numerics?
