https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121185
--- Comment #27 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #26) > (In reply to kargls from comment #25) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #18) > > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17) > > > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #16) > > > > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #15) > > > > > > Created attachment 61950 [details] > > > > > > Close-to-minimal reproducer, 186 lines > > > > > > > > > > > > The division of the array pmatrix%value by trace is not performed > > > > > > elemental > > > > > > but just on the first array element. > > > > > > > > > > Great reproducer! > > > > > > > > > > Changing the line > > > > > > > > > > pmatrix%value = pmatrix%value / trace * pmatrix%degree > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > pmatrix%value(:) = pmatrix%value / trace * pmatrix%degree > > > > > > > > > > to suppress the reallocation on assignment fixes the testcase for me. > > > > > > > > > > Can you try to revert Mikael's recent changes and see if it fixes the > > > > > regression? > > > > > > > > Which commit by Mikael is that? must have been after Monday 0:01 or so. > > > > I am still checking the second example with the VEGAS/VAMP integration > > > > whether this is a similar problem or something else. > > > > > > The following commits come to mind: > > > > > > r16-2247, r16-2248, r16-2249 > > > > Yes, I suspect one of Mikael's patch is hitting a condition that was not > > anticipated and not covered in the testsuite. I haven't had time to bisect, > > yet. > > Hm just changed to HEAD bd0ddee220f0988aec641060021298b343ae6922 (daily bump > from Monday July 21 early morning), but still see the problem with the code. No, you could go back to 48479558b5d687460ab547625a98b851ec422476 (r16-2245)
