https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
--- Comment #6 from Christoph & Ursula Grein <[email protected]> --- Eric, my intention is to add as much information as I have about a (possible) bug. These reports are from 2021 to a company I then was not a supported user of. So it's understandable that I didn't get any further information about the process of bug fixing. As I'm keeping track of old reports and I now have a new compiler version, I just retested the few last open reports and found those here still existing (others were fixed). Since this is a new open forum where one can discuss reports, I just rereported to see what will happen. This is after 4 years of the first reports after all. Isn't it normal to ask after such a long time? Il faut de la patience avec clients. Even if I did not follow the expected path. Christoph PS: SI units from the very beginning in 2002 have always been a challenge for GNAT - this report is about the last work-around in the code. I can live with it - but a prolem report is appropriate nevertheless... Am 05.10.2025 um 10:09 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159 > Because of the cross-reporting.
