https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > OK, thanks, I'll get the atomicy_dir stuff cleaned up. > > I'm also testing a simpler patch to fix all the warning regressions. Not by just silencing it, I hope. I'll move forward with testing the 2+3 patch (and whatever new unsigned-atomic things that may have been introduced and missed) against current sources (r16-4259-g9242a89d088f44).
