https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #27 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There were still (22-11=)11 regressions compared to r16-3809 for cris-elf at
r16-4373-g385984f555 (still at r16-4386-g5b57da59c12e69). I'll open a separate
PR for:
g++.sum g++-dg-lto-devirt-2-01.exe
g++.sum g++.dg/ipa/devirt-2.C
but these 9 seem attributable to the same r16-3810 commit:
libstdc++.sum 24_iterators/reverse_iterator/100639.cc
libstdc++.sum 27_io/print/1.cc
libstdc++.sum 27_io/print/2.cc
libstdc++.sum 27_io/print/3.cc
libstdc++.sum 29_atomics/atomic_ref/requirements.cc
libstdc++.sum std/ranges/iota/93267.cc
libstdc++.sum std/ranges/iota/96042.cc
libstdc++.sum std/ranges/iota/size.cc
libstdc++.sum std/ranges/subrange/96042.cc
All but one are compilation or linking errors for a missing funlockfile
function (some of the errors are at compilation stage, others for linking
state).
The atomic one is
/gccobj/cris-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h:1555: \
error: static assertion failed: atomic operations on volatile T must be
lock-free
Sorry, but I think I have to re-open this one.
I did reply to the posted patch, that there were no regressions compared to a
patch concocted of the snippets in this PR, but was not regression-free
compared to r16-3809. It was "only" a vast improvement.
