https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122290
--- Comment #10 from Damian Rouson <damian at archaeologic dot codes> --- Steve, I changed the title based on your suggestion. If I still missed the mark, please feel free to change it again. If I recall correctly, I was originally using something like '1.5_k' and one compiler was accepting it but another compiler wasn't so the developer of the rejecting compiler pointed out that my original choice was invalid and suggested the 'real' intrinsic as a valid alternative.
