https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122290

--- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #10)
> Steve, I changed the title based on your suggestion.  If I still missed the
> mark, please feel free to change it again.
> 
> If I recall correctly, I was originally using something like '1.5_k' and one
> compiler was accepting it but another compiler wasn't so the developer of
> the rejecting compiler pointed out that my original choice was invalid and
> suggested the 'real' intrinsic as a valid alternative.

Thanks for the follow-up (especially given that you were
busy last week with J3 business).  I think Paul changed
the title after he became aware of the PR, and he's 
prepared a patch.  It seems the compiler instance
(built by Jerry) that you mention in comment #11 has
this patch installed.  In the new failing example, do 
you need an 'import tensor_map_t' in the interface block.

Reply via email to