https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32365
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Christopher Albert from comment #10) > Created attachment 62807 [details] > Reworded, change test expectations on messages > > This should really be safe, as the default case would otherwise catch it and > emit the generic error message. Now the message is closer to the existing > ones in the code. Let me know what you think. Looks good. I would hope that a native speaker can assist in finding good wording for the error message. My gut feeling is that "cannot follow" could be replaced by something simpler, e.g. simply "after". If noone else comes up with a better idea, I am fine with your choice.
