https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32365
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #11) > (In reply to Christopher Albert from comment #10) > > Created attachment 62807 [details] > > Reworded, change test expectations on messages > > > > This should really be safe, as the default case would otherwise catch it and > > emit the generic error message. Now the message is closer to the existing > > ones in the code. Let me know what you think. > > Looks good. > > I would hope that a native speaker can assist in finding good wording for > the error message. My gut feeling is that "cannot follow" could be > replaced by something simpler, e.g. simply "after". If noone else comes > up with a better idea, I am fine with your choice. "after" works, I will tweak this and push it.
