https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95558
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> --- > > I don't understand this. Why can't the interposer be non-pure? the code above is handling inline functions (where we make assumption that side effects of interposer are the same, so avaiability is AVAILABLE). But there is missing logic to handle interpolsable functions and we also have the C++ bug where one can interpose by funcction with implementation defined semantics... Honza
