https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123994
Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> I'd tend to lean towards the simpler fix for -16 and the more complete for
> -17 given the possibility of triggering new combinations. While I could
> argue that any regressions caused by such a change were just latent and
> waiting to bite us, safer seems better given we're in the latter half of Feb.
Yeah, sounds good to me.
