https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122992
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Stefanov <kevinstefanov15 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #14) > Please be aware that there is a possibility that this patch may have caused > a regression in i386/avx512 tests: > > https://builder.sourceware.org/testrun- > diffs?op_mode=search_exact&mode=differences&commitish=bb70c7cf5d682cb0d341fcf > 3ecd1a42cb8e7888a&commitish=2a039cadea1c520c61b88e19bdccb5fa70923fe9&jstable_ > select=50 If confirmed to have caused a regression, does that mean I have to run the testsuites with more than enable_languages=c,c++, or that the one difference my patch's testsuite run had with a pristine build's testsuite run, where it was saying that the same test "had disappeared" and in the next line of comparison, saying that it was a "new test that passed", is more than just noise caused by me having the pristine gcc build and the build that includes my patch's changes in different directories? In any case, if confirmed, please let me know what I can do to mitigate that.
