https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122409
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Zhixu Liu from comment #1) > Created attachment 65884 [details] > Fix libc++ include path on musl The original change to introduce this placed the newly-injected libc++ headers at the same position as the libstdc++ ones (on the expectation that the swap between the two should be equivalent) .. the change in the patch seems to do the same thing in the two headers shown (which would seem correct), are those the only two extra target headers that override this?
