https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122409
--- Comment #3 from Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2) > (In reply to Zhixu Liu from comment #1) > > Created attachment 65884 [details] > > Fix libc++ include path on musl > > The original change to introduce this placed the newly-injected libc++ > headers at the same position as the libstdc++ ones (on the expectation that > the swap between the two should be equivalent) .. the change in the patch > seems to do the same thing in the two headers shown (which would seem > correct), are those the only two extra target headers that override this? I've only checked the two musl-related headers; not sure how to check for other target headers without a test case to verify.
