https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128620

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> Wasn't this already fixed with r17-6124?
(= r17-6124-g0f8ee5980094f4)

Unfortunately, not - it still happens with r17-6137-ga2a11abfad353f of this
morning.

Reply via email to