On 09/15/2010 09:59 PM, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Thomas Pornin writes:
>> So the G3 from a decade ago does about 2.5x more things per cycle than
>> the PowerPC core in the Cell processor. I find this decidedly fishy.
>
> Welcome to reality! Actually, the PPU on the Cell is capable of more
> 32-bit operations per cycle than the G3, _if_ you use it sensibly. (It
> also has two threads, and of course a much higher clock speed.) You
> might find the manual helpful:
>
>     
> https://www.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/techdocs/7A77CCDF14FE70D5852575CA0074E8ED?Open
>

Hi,

If I may add my two cents, I'd also advise you to look at the AltiVec 
extension. It makes the performance of the PPU a bit less ridiculous.

Nicolas.

> Appendix A explains the performance of the PPU. Appendix B explains the
> performance of the 6 (or 7 or 8) SPUs---I understand that you aren't
> asking about the SPUs, but nobody would buy a Cell without the SPUs; the
> PPU by itself is rather mediocre as a CPU.
>
> ---D. J. Bernstein
>     Research Professor, Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
> Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
>

-- 
Nicolas BENOIT
http://megadictators.net

_______________________________________________
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users

Reply via email to