On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Fotis Georgatos <fo...@mail.cern.ch> wrote (in part):
> For the record, both hardware and virtual/simulated resources are useful, > for different purposes each. I agree entirely and that is exactly the spirit in which I was operating when introduced the question. I never intended to suggest that emulated systems were a perfect/complete replacement for the failed hardware. My question was intended to determine whether cfarm users believe (each according to their own needs) that there was enough value to some sort of shared/central effort to deploy/access/maintain some emulators, and predicated (perhaps incorrectly) on the expectation that the answer would be "no" if real hardware was restored to cfarm. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group Computer Science Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
_______________________________________________ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
