On 28 April 2015 at 23:31, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> 3) Is there any desire from the users to see newer {Free,Net,Open}BSD than
> presently in gcc76's set of VMs?I've found the BSDs are easy to run in a local VM, although it would certainly be nice if they were available on faster cfarm h/w. N.B. GCC also supports Dragonfly BSD now, and that runs well in a VM. I have root on gcc70 so could upgrade that to a newer NetBSD if the people using it would prefer a newer version. I might need simple instructions though, I find the pkg mgt stuff on NetBSD a real pain. > 4) Is there any desire from the users to see Solaris on x86-64 (either VM or > bare metal)? Solaris and Darwin are the targets I most often wish I could test on. > Before somebody jumps on me: > > I am *not* trying to push more work on the CFarm admin(s). > In fact, if there is interest in #2 or #3, I may be able to help by > providing drive images I use on my own system now. > If there is interest in #4, Oracle provides pre-packed installers for use > with VirtualBox. Yeah, I couldn't get that to work on my Fedora machine and gave up. _______________________________________________ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
