On viernes, 1 de enero de 2016 13:39:09 (CET) Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> One thing that QEMU testing cannot do well is testing threaded >> applications and memory models. And with a fast enough processor, >> sometimes QEMU testing will be much slower. I have an example is >> running on a ThunderX (or even an Octeon 3 for those MIPS guys here >> >> :)). Doing a bootstrap/test will only take around 2 hours if you use >> >> all of the cores (48 of them). While doing a compiler build and >> test on a x86_64 using QEMU takes 4-5 hours instead. > >Sorry to wander off-topic.... > >I've been trying to source MIPS and MIPS64 in the US, but I've had a >lot of trouble finding them. They appear to be more popular in India >and China. I thought I tracked down a MIPS dev board, but the store >did not carry it. > >Can you make any recommendations for a MIPS or MIPS64 test board >that's reasonably priced?
I'm listing only the cheapest ones: MIPS32: - MIPS Creator CI20 (IIRC, compatible with Debian) - Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X MIPS64: - Ubiquiti EdgeRouter LITE (compatible with OpenBSD http:// www.openbsd.org/octeon.html ) > >It would be nice if it could run, say, Debian 8 or Fedora and a >Buildbot slave for daily testing. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info _______________________________________________ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
