On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 22:58 +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On viernes, 1 de enero de 2016 13:39:09 (CET) Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> One thing that QEMU testing cannot do well is testing threaded > >> applications and memory models. And with a fast enough processor, > >> sometimes QEMU testing will be much slower. I have an example is > >> running on a ThunderX (or even an Octeon 3 for those MIPS guys here > >> > >> :)). Doing a bootstrap/test will only take around 2 hours if you use > >> > >> all of the cores (48 of them). While doing a compiler build and > >> test on a x86_64 using QEMU takes 4-5 hours instead. > > > >Sorry to wander off-topic.... > > > >I've been trying to source MIPS and MIPS64 in the US, but I've had a > >lot of trouble finding them. They appear to be more popular in India > >and China. I thought I tracked down a MIPS dev board, but the store > >did not carry it. > > > >Can you make any recommendations for a MIPS or MIPS64 test board > >that's reasonably priced? > > I'm listing only the cheapest ones: > > MIPS32: > - MIPS Creator CI20 (IIRC, compatible with Debian) > - Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X > > MIPS64: > - Ubiquiti EdgeRouter LITE (compatible with OpenBSD http:// > www.openbsd.org/octeon.html ) > > > > >It would be nice if it could run, say, Debian 8 or Fedora and a > >Buildbot slave for daily testing. > >
Hi, New farm machines with MIPS64 will be announced in the coming days (I'm very very late on this project ...) Happy new year, Laurent _______________________________________________ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
