-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/06/11 03:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 05:21 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Also, instead of testing for XEXP(SET_SRC(PATTERN(i3)),1) == const0_rtx
>> at the top, it now allows CONST_INT_P(XEXP(SET_SRC(PATTERN(i3)),1)),
>> tries to adjust it by simplify_compare_const() from the last patch, and
>> then tests if op1 == const0_rtx. This is a small improvement in some
>> cases.
> 
> I'm not sure why it doesn't allow both?
Part of the purpose of the patch is be more general in the constants
allowed; prior to Chung-Lin's patch only const0_rtx was allowed.
Chung-Lin's patch generalizes the code to allow other constants is
specific cases.

Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNxA9+AAoJEBRtltQi2kC79lUH/2s2u2HNJMSedW5RFGPhYghX
zIosctPzZ4EkqrH5uvNJMBRxnxu0sBmDcJM5HcoaA5tz/T1aHlsGk6XvPeh+gSJO
wDnFHCUMdmB7hXSB/BcpAC5496DTrZNoyix5qIwIpxPjlaA9n4LoSA+ZiO6nObPH
dZ6UfyCihF+zCukSSQ0qHywJvSVfsQByBYefspS7uy0yFhzm45LHTcIN/j4hC685
lC2lIsBH7ZtMV01tRbr47PGgoey0pwvVeiHf/FcCWA6+Zo2ctfyjzsaE3exg8ms6
zylDHA/9gf2D1oYFn5FmrnHiYt3WGX/75u7bJCCJK1OUKknq6MnexVnfITsovFo=
=7ZnG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to