Re: [PATCH] PR63175 - [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

[David Edelsohn]

Does this patch really fix the problem?  The PR notes that the
testcase fails and code quality has regressed.  Has the code
generation been corrected but the testcase looks for the wrong string?
 Presumably the message that basic block was vectorized means that the
code generation is correct, but the commentary about the patch does
not mention it.

Thanks, David