On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > Does this patch really fix the problem? The PR notes that the > testcase fails and code quality has regressed. Has the code > generation been corrected but the testcase looks for the wrong string? > Presumably the message that basic block was vectorized means that the > code generation is correct, but the commentary about the patch does > not mention it.
We certainly no where dump "basic block vectorized using SLP" but "basic block vectorized" and "Basic block will be vectorized using SLP" Richard. > Thanks, David
