On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote: > >> Yes, you are right. It's my fault to add the "only" here. Thank you to point >> out this. >> Beside this, is this patch OK for you? > > I don't think it's a good idea for libgcc to include large pieces of > assembly code generated by a compiler. Just compile the code with > whatever options are needed at the time libgcc is built - possibly with > #if conditionals to allow compiling different versions of the code. > Indeed, are any special options needed at all?
I agree and I don't think it's maintainable in the long run. From my reading of this thread I can't see any special options being needed. Can we just massage it in C ? regards Ramana > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com
