On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > The following two libgcc patches have seen almost no comments, and > certainly neither testing or review in a week: > > CFT: [build] Move fp-bit support to toplevel libgcc > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00927.html > > CFT: [build] Move soft-fp support to toplevel libgcc > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00931.html > > This patch will need to be updated for the recent addition of the c6x > port. > > Both will probably need build and libgcc maintainers and either a bunch > of target maintainers or a global reviewer. I wonder how to proceed > here: I've got a bunch of further libgcc patches in the works or > planned, but if I can't get them reviewed, there's no point in > continuing that work.
Do you still need support?