On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > I also took the liberty of rewriting the list of new command-line > options to be less repetitive.
Nice! (Aka "Thanks for doing this, please go ahead and commit.") There is one question, but that is not introduced by your change: Does the language now suggest that -Wshift-overflow=2 is enabled by default, and hence shifting 1 into the sign bit? Let's address this separately, though, your change is fine as is, Manuel! > + <li><code>-Wshift-overflow</code> warns about left shift > overflows. <code>-Wshift-overflow=2</code> also warns about > left-shifting 1 into the sign bit. This warning is enabled by > default.</li> David, what do you think? Gerald